Vice-Chancellor’s pay rise angers trade unions

Burnett has received a six per cent salary increase
Vice-Chancellor Keith Burnett's pay rise has incensed trade unions

The University of Sheffield’s Vice Chancellor Keith Burnett has been awarded a pay rise of six per cent, infuriating trade unions.

Burnett’s salary has increased from £294,000 to £311,000, a rise which trade union bosses say is a “slap in the face.”

Unison Branch Secretary Stuart Anderson told The Sheffield Star: “For the Vice-Chancellor of Sheffield University to get a pay rise of six per cent taking his total remuneration to over £311,000, in the same year that the university effectively tore up many people’s retirement plans is obscene and a slap in the face for ordinary workers.

“This six per cent rise in these times will go down like a bucket of cold sick with our members, it is morally irresponsible and more becoming of the obscene bankers bonuses and greedy CEOs than the actions of a leader of a civic institution like the University of Sheffield.”

Last May workers and lecturers at the university went on strike in protest over pensions cuts.

A University of Sheffield Spokesman said: “Professor Keith Burnett is a leading Vice-Chancellor in the UK University sector and his total remuneration package is in the mid-range when reviewed against that of Vice-Chancellors from comparator universities.

“The Vice-Chancellor and all senior staff received the nationally-agreed pay award of 0.4 per cent in the 2010/11 financial year. The 5.8 per cent increase in the Vice-Chancellor’s total remuneration package from 2009/10 to 2010/11 arises due to the award of a non-consolidated performance bonus payment in 2010/11.

“His salary reflects the huge responsibility of leading a complex organisation ranked in the top 100 Universities in the world.”


One Response to “Vice-Chancellor’s pay rise angers trade unions”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment. is published by Sheffield Students’ Union. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the University, the Union or the editorial team. In the first instance all complaints should be addressed to the Managing Editor, although a formal procedure exists.

All comments on are moderated before publication (or rejection). When you post a comment, it is held in a queue until we approve or reject it.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but personal attacks and defamatory comments are not acceptable.

Any complaints should be directed to the Managing Editor. Upon recieving a complaint we will remove the comment in question from view as soon as possible, so the complaint can be investigated. If a basis for complaint can be established, the comment will be permanently removed.